Comments on: Dynamic Web-Browser http://www.keebler.net/blog/2007/01/16/dynamic-web-browser/ Tue, 16 Feb 2010 13:44:48 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Mike Sukmanowsky http://www.keebler.net/blog/2007/01/16/dynamic-web-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-4884 Mike Sukmanowsky Fri, 02 Feb 2007 17:50:28 +0000 http://www.keebler.net/blog/2007/01/16/dynamic-web-browser/#comment-4884 For a broadband video app? Hmm...not sure, is this intended to compete against the YouTube's of the world or just something for yourself? For a broadband video app? Hmm…not sure, is this intended to compete against the YouTube’s of the world or just something for yourself?

]]> By: Jonathan http://www.keebler.net/blog/2007/01/16/dynamic-web-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-4855 Jonathan Thu, 01 Feb 2007 00:14:35 +0000 http://www.keebler.net/blog/2007/01/16/dynamic-web-browser/#comment-4855 I totally agree with your "commonality" comment. There would have to be a standard for "linking" that kept these sites linked together into a Web, otherwise, the idea of surfing would be compromised. As for the next site, I'm still adding a bunch of features to <a href="http://whyyoushould.org" rel="nofollow">WYS</a> to make it "Enterprise", then we'll see. I'm itching to build a broadband video application of some kind so we'll see... Any suggestions? :) I totally agree with your “commonality” comment. There would have to be a standard for “linking” that kept these sites linked together into a Web, otherwise, the idea of surfing would be compromised.

As for the next site, I’m still adding a bunch of features to WYS to make it “Enterprise”, then we’ll see. I’m itching to build a broadband video application of some kind so we’ll see…

Any suggestions? :)

]]> By: Mike Sukmanowsky http://www.keebler.net/blog/2007/01/16/dynamic-web-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-4850 Mike Sukmanowsky Wed, 31 Jan 2007 19:25:25 +0000 http://www.keebler.net/blog/2007/01/16/dynamic-web-browser/#comment-4850 I think the idea is neat...but I still say that computing itself needs to move to the next level. To me the idea of even looking at windows on a monitor (be it a fancy plasma or a clunky CRT) is getting old and can use some revamping. I say we move to a virtual reality world :) The only caveat that I'd also say to the idea is that there should still be some element of commonality in the browser and it shouldn't be completely dynamic. Novice users are complete creatures of habit and unless sites have some common elements (areas to change core browser options for example). Developers would love the idea of customizing everything and anything they wanted, but I'm not so sure users would be as appreciative. BTW...what's the next site going to be? I think the idea is neat…but I still say that computing itself needs to move to the next level. To me the idea of even looking at windows on a monitor (be it a fancy plasma or a clunky CRT) is getting old and can use some revamping. I say we move to a virtual reality world :)

The only caveat that I’d also say to the idea is that there should still be some element of commonality in the browser and it shouldn’t be completely dynamic. Novice users are complete creatures of habit and unless sites have some common elements (areas to change core browser options for example).

Developers would love the idea of customizing everything and anything they wanted, but I’m not so sure users would be as appreciative.

BTW…what’s the next site going to be?

]]>