<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My musical taste algorithm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.keebler.net/blog/2009/02/15/my-musical-taste-algorithm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.keebler.net/blog/2009/02/15/my-musical-taste-algorithm/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 13:44:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kat</title>
		<link>http://www.keebler.net/blog/2009/02/15/my-musical-taste-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-75750</link>
		<dc:creator>kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 05:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keebler.net/blog/?p=5321#comment-75750</guid>
		<description>if that&#039;s your algorithm, then why isn&#039;t our musical matchup higher? i believe it&#039;s only at &quot;medium&quot;. those sound like bands i would like!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if that&#8217;s your algorithm, then why isn&#8217;t our musical matchup higher? i believe it&#8217;s only at &#8220;medium&#8221;. those sound like bands i would like!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
